Anthropology of gender and kinship

Pre-requisites: No specific requirements.

Course objectives: Introduction to fundamental theoretical and methodological issues, approaches and results of anthropological study of kinship, marriage, gender relations and sexuality, as well as different cultural conceptualization of these relations.

Course description: For now almost a century and a half, research of kinship occupies a central position in anthropological research. History of anthropological thought on kinship reveals the theoretical and epistemological shifts that are noticeable specifically from the seventies. The result of these changes is the redefinition of the domains and areas of research and the review of fundamental principles, notions and concepts in the context of the new orientation and knowledge. In the process of critical reflection on theoretical and analytical categories and values of discipline problems of gender relations, bodies and sexuality move toward to the center of research of the relationships.

Learning Outcomes: Mastering the fundamental analytical concepts and categories of anthropological study of kinship and different paradigms of research. The ability of in-depth perception and definition of research problems.

Literature/Reading:

• 7. A. Kuper, Lineage theory- A critical retrospect u: R. Parkin with Linda Stone (eds.), Kinship and family. An athropological reader, Blackwell publishing ltd., Oxford 2004, 79-93
• 5. Bont (ed.), Épouser au plus proches. Incest, prohibitions et stratégies matrimoniales autour de la Méditerranée, EHESS, Pasis, 1994.
• 1. M. Godelije, Ubistvo oca ili žrtvovanje seksualnosti? Pretpostavke o osnovama socijalne veze, Treći program, br. 119-120,Beograd, 2003, 285-312.
• 2. J. B. Silk, Ties That Bond: The Role of Kinship in Primate Societies, u: L. Stone (ed.), New Directions in Anthropological Kinship, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, New York, Oxford, 2001, 71-92.
• 3. Z. Ivanović, Još jednom o formativnom periodu antropologije: promena pojma istorije,Etnološke sveske 21( n.s.) 10, 2013, 183-199.
• 4. A. L. Kreber, Klasifikacioni sistemi srodstva, u : Dragoljub Mićunović (ur.), Teorije o društvu. Osnovi savremene sociološke teorije, knj 1, Vuk Karadžić, Beograd 1969, 263-267.
• 5. Z. Ivanović, Da li su postojala na "srodsvu zasnovana društva"? O (de)konstrukciji jednog antropološkog koncepta, Etnoantropološki problemi, n. s. god. 5, sv. 3, 2010, 19-32
• 6. E. E. Evans-Pričard, Nuersko političko uređenje, u: E.E. Evans-Pričard, Socijalna antropologija, Prosveta, Biblioteka XX vek, Beograd, 1983, 306-383.
• 6. J. Fishburne Collier and S. Junko Yanagisako (eds.), Gender and Kinship, Essays Toward a Unified Analysis, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1987.
• 8. Z. Ivanović, Antropološka kritika teze o "braku kupovinom žena". Prilog promišljanju interdisiciplinarnosti,Etnoantropološki problemi, n. s. god. 2, sv. 4, 2007, 169-196; 201-206. (157-220)
• 4. Ž. Papić, Polnost i kultura, XXvek, Beograd, 1997, 182-193; 260-291.
• 9. Z. Ivanović, Na koga liče deca? Srodstvo kod Srba i principi percepcije sličnosti među srodnicima,u: Životni ciklus u gradskoj sredini, Posebna izdanja EI SANU, knj. 48, Beograd, 2002, 375-382 (375-408)
• 3. C. Hua, ASocietywithout Fathers or Husbends. The Na of China, Zone Books, New York, 2001.
• 10. S. E. Hutchinson, Identity and substance: the broadening bases of relatedness among the Nuer of southern Sudan, In: Janet Carsten (ed.), Culture of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, Camridge University Press, Camridge,2000, 55-72.
• 11. E. Lič, Klod Levi-Stros, Prosveta, Biblioteka XX vek, Beograd, 1982, 120-136.
• 2. T. R.Trautmann, Lewis Henry Morgan and the Invention of Kinship, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1987.
• 12. G. Gorunović, Strukturalno-antropološka teorija srodstva Klod Levi-Strosa, Antropologija. Časopis Centra za etnološka i antropološka istraživanja Filozofaskog fakulteta u Beogradu, Beograd, 2009, 17-30.
• 1. T. R. Trautmmann, The Whole History of Kinship Terminology in Three Chapters. Before Morgan, Morgan and after Morgan, Anthropological Today, Vol 1 (2), 2007, 268- 287.
• 13. Gejl Rubin. „Trgovina ženama: beleške o ’političkoj ekonomiji polnosti’. U: Ž. Papić, L. Sklevicky, Antropologija Žene, Biblioteka XX vek, 2003, 87-145.
• 14. Z. Ivanović, Antropološka kritika teze o "braku kupovinom žena",Etnoantropološki problemi, n. s. god. 2, sv. 4, 2007, 169-207.
• 15. Z. Ivanović, Pogovor: „Antropologija žene” i pitanje rodnih odnosa u izmenjenom diskursu antropologije, u: Ž. Papić, L. Sklevicky (ur.), Antropologija žene, Drugo izdanje, XX vek, Beograd, 2003, 387- 435.
• 16. Ž. Papić, Novija feministička kritika patrijarhata: relativizacija univerzalizma, Sociologija, br. 1, 1993, 107-120.
• 17. S. Junko Yanagisako and J. Fishburne Collier, Toward a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship, In: Robert Parkin with Linda Stone (eds.), Kinship and Family. An Anthropological Reader, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 2004, 275-293.
• 18. M. Bloch, Descent and Sources of Contradiction in Representations of Woman and Kinship, u : J. Fishburne Collier and S. Yanagisako (eds.), Gender and Kinship. Essays toward a Unified Analysis, Stanford University Press, Stanford, 1987, 324-337.
• 19. A. Waltner, Kinship Between the Lines : The Patriline, the Concubine and the Adopted Son in Late Imperial China, In: Mary Jo Maynes, Ann Waltner, Brigitte Soland and Urlike Strasser (eds.), Gender, Kinship, Power. A Comparative and Interdisciplinary History, Routledge, New York, London, 1996,67-78.
• 21. Žikić, Bojan (2008), „Neukroćena ‘goropad’: upravljanje reprodukcijom kao kulturna praksa“. Etnoantropološki problemi, n.s. god. 3, sv. 1, 2008, 143-157.http://www.anthroserbia.org/Content/PDF/Articles/zikic_upravljanje_reprodukcijom_kao_kulturna_praksa.pdf
• 22. Roberts, Dorothy (1996), Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction and the Meaning of Liberty, ch. 6, New York: Pantheon, 246-293. http://www.geneticsandsociety.org/article.php?id=1993
• 23. Goslinga Roj, Džilijan (2003), Granice tela, fikcija ženskog ja. Etnografski pogled na moć, feminizam i reproduktivne tehnologije, Kultura, br.105/106,183-209.http://www.zaprokul.org.rs/Media/Document/CasopisKultura/1687.pdf
• 24. Hayden, Corine P., (1995), Gender, Genetics, and Generation : Reformulation Biology in Lesbian Kinship, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 41-63. http://anthropology.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/hayden%20Gender%20Genetics.pdf
• 25. M. Miterauer, Kad je Adam kopao a Eva prela: Istorijsko antropološki ogledi iz prošlosti evropske porodice, Udruženje za društvenu istoriju, Beograd, 2001, 2001, 51-71.
• 26. S. Bojanin, Bračne odredbe Žičke povelje između crkvenog i narodnog koncepta braka, Vizantijski svet na Balkanu, 2012, 425-442.
• 27. F. Eritije,Dve sestre i njihova mati. Antropologija incesta,XXvek, Beograd, 2003, 5-22; 274- 304, 361-365.
• 28. M. Godelije, Sol-novac i robni promet kod Barija u Novoj Gvineji, u: Moris Godelije, Marksizan i antropologija, Školska knjiga, Zagreb, 1982, 289-336.
• 29. A. Perdoso de Lima, Is blood ticker than economic interest in familial enterprises? u: P. P. Schweitzer (ed.), Dividends of Kinhip. Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness, Routledge, London and New York, 2000, 151-174
• 30. J. B. White, Kinship, reciprocity and the world market, u: P. P. Schweitzer (ed.), Dividends of Kinhip. Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness, Routledge, London and New York, 2000, 124-148.
• 31. H. Lutz, The New Maids. Transnational Women and the Care Economy, Zed Books, London, New York, 2011,111-118 (deo poglavlja Transnational Motherhood)
• 32. A. Milić, Porodica. Dijalog sociologije i istorije, u: Rađanje moderne porodice. Sociološka hrestomatija, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd,1988, 1-42.
• 33. J. S. Modell, Open Adoptions: Extended Families, Exchanging Facts, u: L. Stone (ed.), New Directions in Anthropological of Kinship, Rowman and Littlefield Publichers, New York, Oxford, 2001, 246-264.
• 34. Z. Mršević, Registrovano partnerstvo kao neophodna civilna opcija i deo feminističke agende, http://www.gay-serbia.com/teorija/2004/04-08-28-registrovano-partnerstvo/index.jsp
• 35. M. Hughson, Sami roditelji na zapadnom Balkanu, u: Isidora Jarić (ur.), Politike roditeljstva: iskustva, diskursi i institucionalne prakse, Sociološko udruženje Srbije i Crne Gore, Institut za sociološka istraživanja, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu, Beograd, 2015, 11-34.
• 36. Hayden, Corine P., (1995), Gender, Genetics, and Generation : Reformulation Biology in Lesbian Kinship, Cultural Anthropology, Vol. 10, No. 1, 41-63. http://anthropology.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/hayden%20Gender%20Genetics.pdf
• 37. H. Ragoné, Surogate Motherhood and American Kinship, In: R. Parkin with L. Stone (eds.), Kinship and Family. An Anthropological Reader, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 2004, 342-360.
• 38. S. M. Kahn, Eggs and Wombs: The Origin of Jewishness, u : R. Parkin with L. Stone (eds.), Kinship and Family. An Anthropological Reader, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 2004, 362-375.
• 39. L. Akesson, Bound by blood? New Meanings of Kinship and Individuality in Discourse of Genetic Counseling, u: L. Stone (ed.), New Directions in Anthropological of Kinship, Rowman and Littlefield Publichers, New York, Oxford, 2001,125-138.
• 40. C. Ivri, Iza kulisa prenatalne nege: prilagođavanje prenatalne dijagnostike akušersko-ginekološkoj praksi u Japanu, u: V. Rakić, I. Mladenović, R. Drezgić (ur.), Bioetika, Institut za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2012, 155-193.
• 7. S. Yanagisako and C. Delanney, Naturalizing Power, u: S. Yanagisako and C. Delanney (eds.), Naturalizing Power. Essays in Feminist Cultural Analysis, Routledge, New York, London, 1995.
• 8. Mary Jo Maynes, Ann Waltner, Brigitte Soland and Urlike Strasser (eds.), Gender, Kinship, Power. A Comparative and Interdisciplinary History, Routledge, New York, London, 1996.
• 9. Edmund R. Leach, Virgin Birth, Proceedings of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Irland, 1966, 39-49.
• 10. F. Ginsburg, R. Rapp, Politics of Reproduction, Annual Reviews in Anthropology 20, 1991, 311-343.
• 11. L. Stone, Kinship and Gender. An Introduction, Westiew Press, Oxford, 1997.
• 12. G. Duby, Vitez, ženasvećenik, Logos, Split, 1987.
• 13. G. Duby, Love and Marriage in the Middle Ages, Polity Press, 1994.
• 14. J. Goody, The developement of the family and marriage in Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.
• 15. P. Burdije, Nacrt za jenu teoriju prakse. Tri studije o kabilskoj etnologiji, Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva, Beograd, 1999, 63-115.
• 16. P. P. Schweitzer (ed.), Dividends of Kinhip. Meanings and Uses of Social Relatedness, Routledge, London and New York, 2000.
• 17. J. Butler, Is Kinship Always Already Heterosexual?, A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, Vol. 13, Nº 1, 2002, 14-44.
• 18. K. Weston, Families We Choose. Lesbians, Gays, Kinship, Revised Edition with a new Preface, Columbia University Press, New York, 1997.
• 19. M.Strathern, Reproducing the Future. Essayson anthropology, kinship and the new reproductive technologies, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1992.
• 20. S. Franklin and H. Ragoné, Reproducing Reproduction. Kinship, Power and Technological Inovation, Univeristy of Pensylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1998.
• 21. J. Cromberg and T. Jenkins, Cultural Influences on the Perception of Genetic Disorders in the Black Population of Southern Africa, u: A. Clarke and E. Parsons (eds.), Culture, Kinship and Genes. Toward Cross-Cultural Genetics, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 1997, 147- 157.
• 22. D. Heat, R. Rapp and K-S. Taussing, Genetic Citizenship, u: D. Nugent and J. Vinsent (eds.), A Companion to the Anthropology of Politics, Blackwell Publishing, London, 2004, 152-167.